Data Quality Evaluation
Initial Info
Descriptives
Design
Conformance
Context
Summary
Funded by:
1. Descriptives
Metadata Documentation
Identifier
Dataset Description
Subject/Keywords
Start typing to see suggestions. Press Enter or click to add.
Language
Select language
English
French
German
Spanish
Chinese
Other
Please specify:
Metadata Documentation
Metadata Standards
Conformance to established standards
Select conformance
No
Unclear
Yes
Standards used:
ISO 19115
CSDGM
DCMI
ISO 19139
Other
+
Score Metadata Documentation
Select score
1: Documentation largely missing
2: Metadata not self-explanatory and standardized
3: Metadata largely self-explanatory and standardized
4: Fully documented, comprehensible, machine-readable
Accessibility
Access Restrictions
Public
Internal
Restricted
Other / Additional
Retrieval – API availability
Manual download
Partial API support
Commercial API
Open API
Usage rights / License
Open
Restricted
Commercial
Unknown
Data Format
Select format
CSV
GeoJSON
Shapefile
Excel (XLSX)
GeoTIFF
JSON
XML
NetCDF
PDF
Other
Format Standards
auto-filled via metadata conformance
No
Unclear
Yes (standardized)
OGC
Score Accessibility
Select score
1: Strongly restricted (private use, manual download, uncommon format)
2: Commercial OR proprietary (fee, license, API, format)
3: Partly open access (license, API, exchange format)
4: Fully open access (open license and API, interoperable format)
Spatial Accuracy
CRS / Projection
Select Coordinate Reference System
WGS 84
EPSG:3857
EPSG:4326
UTM
NAD83
ETRS89
Lambert Conformal Conic
Mercator
Unknown
Other
Positional Accuracy
Spatial Uncertainty
Score Spatial Accuracy
Select score
1: Location unknown, no projection info
2: Low positional accuracy, high spatial uncertainty, incomplete projection info
3: Acceptable spatial uncertainty and positional inaccuracy, local projection
4: Accurate geolocation, standard projection
Previous
Next Section